WHO IS THE LIAR OR DOES IT MATTER

I recently applied for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and was denied.  I did everything right.  I applied for a Writ seven months before I was released from jail.  The rule states that you must apply while you are still in custody and you must exhaust your administrative remedy.  In addition, I had two pending charges and was on bond which is deemed to be the same as custody per case law.  The U.S.District Judge ruled that this was not custody and the reason he gave made no logical sense.  In addition to this, he or the District Clerk refused to image my application and someone destroyed my application and substituted other documents  and orders that I had never seen before.  My indictment and charged was changed to passing a forged instrument. Not a crime in Texas at the time and one that I was not indicted or tried and convicted of.   The entire record was falsified to support this charge by someone.  I contacted the U.S. District Clerk and they had no reason why my documents and application and exhibits were destroyed.  They did not know who forged the order and other documents that were added to my application.  I was told by the clerk that my original application was not imaged and had been destroyed.  She was unable to give me a reason why this was done or tell me who falsified the documents in my file.  I have learned that there is a conspiracy between the state and federal courts to defeat appeals.  The record are destroyed and new ones falsified when the courts do not image your documents.  The judge in 5th Circuit stated that he did online research and was not able to find a record of my filings for Writ of Habeas Corpus for the filings that were made in September, 2009 and November or February, 2010 and they had been altered.  The Texas Supreme Court stated that they did not image my file.  Therefore, the 5th Circuit Judge knew the Writ had not been imaged and there was no docket that he could have viewed or obtained his information.  He was straight up lying to deny my review.  Moreover he cited a basis for his decision and the case he cited indicated that the case should always be reviewed.  My case cited sixty three trial court errors and seventy three violations of the United States Constitution, federal law, and treaty.  The court is arbitrary and capricious about the cases it will review or not.  The statute indicates that this is a case that should be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court’s own rules and the statute itself.  I am a Black, female and poor.  I am the exception to the Rule for review in federal and state court per the judges who are interpreting the statute.  Someone is lying.  Either the 5th Circuit Judge is lying or the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is lying.  In fact, both are pathological liars and corrupt as they both are participating in the altering and destruction of petitioner’s records to deny or defeat their appeals.  When they indicate that they are not imaging their application, this means that they are not filing them. Both systems are corrupt and are tampering with government documents.  It does not matter who is telling the truth.  The end effect is the same.  The appeal is denied and the appeal was fixed by corrupt court persons in the state and federal courts. Petitioners should not have their documents withdrawn and others  substituted by strangers that have no connection to them and their original documents destroyed without their knowledge.