The Terror Continues–Some Thoughts

It has been thirteen years since I was falsely accused of a crime in College Station, Texas and convicted despite having no criminal liability for any crime anywhere.  The last two weeks, the burglaries have continued. The break-in the night of my purse and car and other places. Let me tell you what they stole and why.

The thieves stole the complaints of Urban dated August 10, and 15, 2007 from my purse. These complaints indicate absolute innocence for me in my case evidenced by the fact that checks were altered by the prosecution or the bank and the dates on the checks were changed by someone from December 4, 2006 to December 27, 2006 and January 8, 2007. I was never given written notice of dishonor by the bank and was repeatedly told that the checks were in fact good by the bank. Moreover, the State’s own witness at the trial stated the checks had never been sent to them for payment. Therefore, it was not known at the trial whether the checks were good or not. There was no testimony about anything distinguishing about the checks such that you could know whether they were good or not. Per Texas Banking law, when they did not send the checks to Article 4 bank within 60 days of presentment, all liability for endorsement was discharge. There was no criminal liability for the checks at the time of arrest or conviction. The other problem is the single transaction or occurrence issue. I took all 14 checks in to the bank in the envelope that they were mailed in when I talked to the teller. She took the checks back somewhere to verify and came back and stated that they were good. This was a single transaction or occurrence. Instead, I was convicted of twelve counts—one count for each check. I was in not in town  that week and was not even in the bank several times as the 10th Court of Appeals indicates in its opinion. Let us talk about the opinion.

I had five copies of different opinions written by the 10th Court of Appeals on the same date indicating that there were two different trials conducted in the 361 and 272 at the same time. I was the defendant and the lead counsel. I could not be in two trials at the same time. Two of the verdicts including the judgment used in the State Bar’s Motion for Disbarment were verdicts in Abstentia in which I have never been served with the indictments or information, answered the charge in open court or participated in the trial at any stage. I was not present at the sentencing. All documents in the files have been altered and the actual documents in my trial have been destroyed. The original indictment which was served on me was not the one presented at my trial as I had never seen those indictments read at my trial before and every indictment that I have ever seen or been given had an impossible date for the commission of the crime on them. The Memorandum Opinion that someone filed in the Fifth Circuit was an opinion that I had never seen before and I had not participated in that trial at any stage. Moreover, I was denied my Sixth Amendment Right of confrontation as I did not cross examine any of those witnesses. The testimony was fabricated. All of the record had been falsified by someone. It was another verdict in abstentia. In my real trial, there was ineffective assistance of counsel as the judge would not allow me the lead attorney to give a closing argument and the standby counsel disparaged me by stating that I was bipolar like his daughter and was one brick short of a house. This was harm and it was egregious and indicated and was evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel. Morever, it has been 13 years and there is no record or trial transcript complete enough for me to appeal all of my issues. I alleged sufficiency of the evidence. How can you assess sufficiency of the evidence without a record?  Both court reporters admitted that they had refused to respond to me about a record until 2015. One reporter stated that he did not think that I was serious and the other had no answer other than the clerk would not allow her to have a copy of the exhibits. I had established indigency as the prosecution seized all of my funds, approximately fifty plus thousand which they did not put on any return and did not ever return the funds to me. Additionally, when we purchased a transcript, it was bogus as I had not participated in the trial at any level in the transcript that she sold me. This copy of the transcript was stolen from my purse by a burglar. It was a trial in abstentia. I had never been served with an indictment or answered such an indictment, been present at the conviction or sentencing. I was never allowed to see a complaint or probable cause before, during or until 2015 by the prosecution or the police department. It defies logic that the court reporter and I could have been in same two trials at one time. The burglaries have a theme. Let us look at it. First, they stole all of the files from my criminal trial from my home. They even stole all of my research notes. Then they robbed my safe deposit box at Capitol One Bank where all of my certified copies of indictments were kept along with 27 flash drives, four copies of the trial transcript that I had copied onto a flash drive when I was told not to make a copy. I had purchased two copies of the record from the 10th Court of Appeals. All of these records were stolen from Capitol One Bank with other files on flash drives. When I filed my writ of Habeas Corpus in 2017 which contained 175 points of error including no trial transcript and no free transcript despite my being established as indigent, my pleadings were torn up and new ones written by someone in Bryan/College Station.  Every Writ of Habeas that I have ever filed has alleged absolute innocence which requires a hearing per the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. There has never been a hearing conducted. I felt that the Court of Criminal Appeals was an active participant in the corruption as I sent them a courtesy copy of my Writ which was 590 pages and the Writ published on their website bore little or no resemblance to my writ with case law and evidence supporting it. My safe deposit box at the State Bank of Texas was robbed and the 590 page Writ with all the evidence supporting it and other records were stolen from my box. My home was under seize constantly. All of my law book and any study aide or support were stolen. Records are altered on a routine basis in every court that I file anything in for legal purposes. My documents from Wachovia Bank were stolen by the burglar. These documents showed that Steve Smith, the trial judge in two of the cases in which a verdict in abstentia was rendered (I never participated in any phase of these trials) had been actively participating in the warrantless searches project and he had written a $3000.00 check on that account in Houston and Fort Bend County. Also, the 1st National Bank of Bryan who allegedly brought the charges. The judge’s family owned the bank. They did not file these false charges until I filed an answer and counterclaim of $10,000,000.00 for defamation of character. There were four false complaints that listed impossible dates for the commission of the crime or charges and impossible places as I could not be in two places at one time. Also there were only 14 total checks.  Two employees filed complaints that I had cashed 14 checks in their bank or other checks at impossible times and locations. The prosecutors themselves, in closing testified. I was denied my Sixth Amendment right of confrontation. Burglars stole material document showing evidence Brady violations of concealing exculpatory evidence such as the letter from investigators from out of town stating that the person who had loaned the California client money has borrowed the money from his home and it was not an illegal source. The prosecutor prepared and filed false notices and did not serve the defense, concealed exculpatory e-mails and the fact that they had seized the $17,000.00 that was sent for the checks by the client when they realized the funds were not good. One notice of extraneous offenses is laughable. They allege conviction for plagerism for which I have never been charged anywhere in the universe, money laundering, criticizing a judge or advocating for my client when a crooked and corrupt Judge Kern took my client’s separate property in the amount of $700,000.00 by not allowing his expert witness to testify that my client had this money in his 401k before he ever met his wife from a company closing and making a settlement to him. This same judge prevented him from seeing his children with a crooked and counterfeit expert without alleging any type of abuse. The wife had mental health issues and was jealous that the children liked the father too much. When my email account disappeared, I did not learn who had taken it until the middle of the trial. All emails were lost. Yahoo testified that emails could be altered and were unreliable. There were many more documents stolen that could be used for reversible errors in my trial. I thought that if I exposed what they had taken and continue to take, that they might stop. They do not want me to have any documents at all to support my claims. The burglarized once or twice a week in a search for document. If they fail in stealing the documents, the alter the court records. Elwyn thinks I should stop or they will kill me. If they kill me or I am found dead, the public will know why. These are very evil people. One of the evil cops is now Chief of Police in College Station. Go figure. This is the Southern justice people are receiving. White Rage, Jim Crow, Prosecutorial Misconduct do not begin to describe the evil in Bryan/College Station Judicial system. The Justice Department needs to investigate them. They did not start this corruption with my case.

HELEN MAYFIELD, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.