THE COVER-UP CONTINUES BUT TRUTH IS BEING REVEALED
The cover-up continues in College Station but the truth is also being revealed.
On March 12, 2018 I went to the Precinct 3 to obtain records for the third time. This time they refused to accept my money, sell me records and denied that they had ever had records. I met with Amy Reed, Kyndra Jones and Brooke whom I had encountered before. They told me that the Judge in 361st District Court had issued an order that I can no longer obtain a copy of their records and the records have been sent to the District Attorney and the 361st District Court. I can only obtain the recordds from the 361st District Court. Remember this is the Judge who has been destroying and falsifying records. For example, I saw an order from this judge of the 361st District Court stating that my property had been returned to me and that I had been bonded out when I was still incarcerated. The police have never returned my passport, bank books and records, tax records from 1966 to the present, mortage and time share payment receipts, my cashier’s check in the amount of $4100.00 and receipt of purchase which was taken, cash, legal files and records, personal receipts and records, two computers and copiers and fax machines, my silver collection. I lost my timeshare, $55000.00 in equity and law suits for clients when they seized these files illegally. They did not return those files or my property.
Additional things are also being revealed. First, I obtained a background check from the FBI. It was false and listed fraudulent information about my arrest. It listed the arrest as August 16, 2007. I was not arrested on this date for any crime. I had previously gone to the District Clerk’s office and to the 14th Court of Appeals. The records had been altered and my original appeals brief appears to have now been destroyed with all of its exhibits. A new exhibit is now in the record which is an affidavit from Lt. James Arnold of College Station stating that on August 16, 2007 he went to the bank and took a complaint from the bank which indicates that twelve checks have been returned and two have not been returned. This means that the bank clerk committed perjury when they filed the complaint or this affidavit is false. The sworn testimony on the record was that twelve checks were presented to the 1st National Bank of Bryan but as of the date of the trial no checks had been sent to an Article 4 Bank for payment. American Express testified that they had never received the checks for payment as of the day of the trial. This meant that under Texas law I did not have any liability for endorsement when he took the complaint. My liability had been discharged. The bank could only collect in civil court. Thus, Lt. Arnold’s witness was committing perjury as there were only thirteen checks total on the day I went to the bank. I did not deposit fourteen checks in any bank on any date. Additionally, the bank clerk testified on the record that twelve checks had been deposited in the Mall in her bank on December 23, 2006. In point of fact, she committed perjury as the Rock Prairie Bank had the checks in their possession and have not released them. There were only fourteen checks and not twenty six. Both clerks are committing perjury. Even more to the point, no deposit was made on December 23, 2006 and no checks were cashed. Only a withdrawal was made. This was perjury on the part of the bank to defeat my Ten Million dollar counterclaim in our civil lawsuit.
Finally, I went to the College Station Police Department and received a complaint signed by Lt. Arnold stating that I had been arrested on August 10, 2007 for the twelve checks and the bond was set for two hundred forty thousand dollars. He had never taken a complaint from the bank per the affidavit filed in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. I was arrested without a warrant and the incident did not occur in his presence. Thus, he violated the law in arresting me without a warrant. Additionally, I was incarcerated for five days without any legitimate charges being filed. This is why they filed the bogus charges of forty four additional counts of forgery from the stale checks found under my mattress and in my legal files at home protected by attorney-client privilege. No warrant was ever issued for my legal files. This was why they had to falsify records and do a massive cover-up. They had made a mistake in supporting Lt. Arnold. I was their human sacrifice. They did what they always do to avoid paying wrongful incarceration claims–they made up a new crime and falsified records. They destroyed all of my original court records. So sad! Oh what a web we weave when we practice to deceive. This is why I could never be allowed to see the records. All courts including the United States Supreme Court appeared to rule that I should never be allowed to see the records as the 10th Court of Appeals ruled in their original opinion. The 10th Court of Appeals stated that I should not be allowed so see any court exhibits before, during or after the trial because “I should have known what was on them anyway.” No they will not release this opinion or sell me a copy of it. The truth is coming out!
