Are the DOG and U.S.SCt. knowing parts of the Corruption?

The question to be asked at this point is whether the Department of Justice and United States Supreme Court are knowing parts of court corruption.  The answer is probably yes.

When I began to be concerned about my International clients and friends sending me funds that were not good, I contacted the Secret Service who referred me to a Washington Office.  That office told me there was nothing they could do. I was advised to try to get the clients to come to America.  Otherwise, there was nothing that could be done.   I also contacted the FBI and was told the same thing.   I also contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation and made a complaint of corruption when a judge appeared to have a pattern of corruption and kickbacks in the way he assessed legal and other fees.  For example,he had numerous children in experimental drug studies and counseling in which the parents were required to pay for the treatment and someone was getting paid for the experimental drug program. There was no evidence that the children needed the treatment or the drugs. In fact, the children were being harmed in that one child committed suicide who was taking the drugs and another was bleeding and may have early cancer from the drugs.   Fathers had to visit their children in the jail program and pay for the supervision even if there was no family violence or abuse, injury to the mother or child.  In two cases, the mothers were abusive to the father per the evidence and testimony of the police but the father had supervised visitation.   He always assigned an ad litem and the ad litem was always paid in advance at least $5000.00.  The pay would sometimes exceed $60,000.00 for the ad litem alone.  The judge would also assign attorney fees to the father even if the jury verdict was in his favor.  Additionally, some ad litems for the children received $250,000.00 a year. Fathers assigned to the jail program had to pay for the visitation.  No wife who was the abuser of the father and children was assigned to the program. Fathers were assigned the maximum for child support regardless of the income of the mother.  This judge had the court reporter to destroy the records selectively.  He was arbitrary and capricious and made up rules as he went along.  Some of the things he did was deny clients jury trials in custody matters, strike pleadings, refuse to allow testimony as to best interest of the child in custody matters. He would also only allow testimony as to the fitness of the father.  Even if one provided expert testimony as to the competency of the father and a psychiatric evaluation, he would state that he could not accept expert testimony unless if was by his court appointed psychiatrist after therapy.  Thus he was getting more income for his court experts which was not needed.  His court experts were not experts.  They were not all licensed to give expert testimony.  He had a “bogus” set of court experts who were not licensed that he used against licensed experts.  He refused to allow Daubert Hearings or voir dire of his court appointed expert or if he did he always determined that they were expert regardless of the testimony.  He would not allow expert testimony as to separate property and state that he was going to make the decision and he would award the father’s separate property to the mother. He was clearly biased. When I made a complaint about his conduct to the judicial commission, the State Bar tried to disbar me for merely making the complaint.  They destroyed all the documents in which the lawyer had her client to commit perjury and illegally obtain child support, attorney fees and fees for treatment and spousal support that I filed with my counter complaint.  The judge was rude and disrespectful to me in front of my client.  There was no excuse for his behavior. Other judges were also disrespectful.  One judge threw my reset on the floor instead of handing it to me.  I was not aware of what he was doing until the District Attorney picked up the form and handed it to me. A female judge would yell at Black lawyers as though they were dogs and refuse to allow them to present a defense in criminal cases. 

     I went to the Justice Department when I learned my home was being regularly burglarized and was told that they only helped when referred by agencies. They did not help individuals. The sworn testimony on the record of the police officer was  that the FBI provided him with the forged documents to support probable cause for the search warrant of my home.  He also testified that they had been searching my home without a warrant for several weeks in order to obtain enough evidence to sustain a warrant.  The FBI and Secret Services operate from the Justice Department.  There have been enough complaints about their behavior that the Supreme Court is aware of their conduct and their disrespect of the law.  The federal judges are protecting them and covering up their unlawful behavior.  Everyone knows what is going on.  No one in American without money can obtain a fair trial anymore.  The system is fixed.  The fox is minding the hen house. When they do not image petitions for writ of habeas corpus and substitute their own orders and other documents and destroy the petitioner’s original documents and burglarize their home and office and steal the date stamped copies, they are committing criminal acts. Only law enforcement of crooked clerks and judges can alter court pleadings.  Too many people including myself have informed the US Attorney, Attorney General and the U.S. Supreme Court for them to pretend that they do not know what is going on.  I sent Attorney General Eric Holder an Certified letter with my complaints with evidence and he wrote back that he was not interested in the matter and would not be of any assistance to me. Yes, they all know what is going on and are not doing anything about it. How can you prosecute yourself?